Tinting Chicago Website Redesign

Tinting Chicago Website Redesign

Employer

Tinting Chicago

My Roles

My Roles

Art Director

UX/UI Designer

Focus Areas

Focus Areas

UX Research & Strategy

Information Architecture

Art Direction

UI Design & Prototyping

Asset Production

Duration

1 year

Team

12 people

Results at a Glance

54% ↑

54% ↑

54% ↑

Conversion Rate

31% ↓

Bounce Rate

43% ↑

43% ↑

43% ↑

Time on Site

384

384

384

Pages Redesigned

Key Constraint: Maintain top SEO rankings throughout the entire redesign

Key Constraint: Maintain top SEO rankings throughout the entire redesign

Key Constraint: Maintain top SEO rankings throughout the entire redesign

Project Overview

Project Overview

Project Overview

Tinting Chicago dominates the local market with strong organic traffic, but the legacy website was failing to convert visitors. The user experience was blocked by three core issues:


  • Overly complex navigation

  • Unclear service hierarchies

  • Outdated aesthetics that undermined trust


The Challenge
Modernize the brand and fix the conversion flow—without breaking the site's #1 SEO rankings that took years to build.

Project goals

Project goals

Project goals

1

1

1

Fix the Information Architecture: Untangle complex navigation to reduce cognitive load.

2

2

2

Clarify the Value: Make high-margin services (like Paint Protection) visible and easy to understand.

3

3

3

Protect SEO Equity: Ensure all UX and structural changes adhere to strict SEO guidelines to maintain organic traffic volume.

4

4

4

Modernize Brand Perception: Elevate the visual identity to reflect the company’s status as a premium market leader.

5

5

5

Drive Conversion: Remove friction from the "Get a Quote" flow to capture more leads.

My Roles and Contribution

My Roles and Contribution

My Roles and Contribution

1

1

1

UX Research & Discovery: Conducted user interviews and card sorting sessions to identify pain points and inform the new information architecture.

2

2

2

Information Architecture: Designed the sitemap, navigation structure, and user flows—balancing SEO requirements with user logic.

3

3

3

Art Direction: Defined the visual style, mood, and quality standards for the design team.

4

4

4

UI Design: Created UI concepts to communicate direction to the team. Designed new pages post-launch as the site expanded.

5

5

5

Asset Management: Directed all photography and video shoots. Set up DAM system to manage assets across 380+ pages.

6

6

6

Cross-Functional Coordination: Worked with PM and SEO team to align design decisions with business metrics and technical constraints.

The SEO vs. UX Conflict

The SEO vs. UX Conflict

We had a hard constraint: we couldn't delete pages because they were ranking high on Google. But for humans, the structure was a mess—services scattered across hundreds of pages with no logical grouping.


My Approach

I ran card sorting sessions to understand how users mentally grouped services. Then I mapped out a new architecture that kept the keyword-rich URLs but reorganized navigation around user mental models. We moved from a "list everything" approach to a categorized system (Automotive, Residential, Commercial).


Result

Users found services 67% faster in tree testing. Zero SEO rankings lost.

We had a hard constraint: we couldn't delete pages because they were ranking high on Google. But for humans, the structure was a mess—services scattered across hundreds of pages with no logical grouping.


My Approach

I ran card sorting sessions to understand how users mentally grouped services. Then I mapped out a new architecture that kept the keyword-rich URLs but reorganized navigation around user mental models. We moved from a "list everything" approach to a categorized system (Automotive, Residential, Commercial).


Result

Users found services 67% faster in tree testing. Zero SEO rankings lost.

We had a hard constraint: we couldn't delete pages because they were ranking high on Google. But for humans, the structure was a mess—services scattered across hundreds of pages with no logical grouping.


My Approach

I ran card sorting sessions to understand how users mentally grouped services. Then I mapped out a new architecture that kept the keyword-rich URLs but reorganized navigation around user mental models. We moved from a "list everything" approach to a categorized system (Automotive, Residential, Commercial).


Result

Users found services 67% faster in tree testing. Zero SEO rankings lost.

Content wasn't just for ranking - it was for conversion. I worked with the SEO team to identify high-traffic topics that aligned with our most profitable services.


We created a library of informative articles that answered real user questions—positioning the brand as a helpful expert, not just a service provider.

Content wasn't just for ranking - it was for conversion. I worked with the SEO team to identify high-traffic topics that aligned with our most profitable services.


We created a library of informative articles that answered real user questions—positioning the brand as a helpful expert, not just a service provider.

Content wasn't just for ranking - it was for conversion. I worked with the SEO team to identify high-traffic topics that aligned with our most profitable services.


We created a library of informative articles that answered real user questions—positioning the brand as a helpful expert, not just a service provider.

Visualizing the Services

Visualizing the Services

Through user interviews, I discovered that people didn't understand the difference between "wrapping" and "tinting"—and text-heavy pages weren't helping. Profitable services like Paint Protection Film were being overlooked because they were buried in navigation.


The insight: users don't want to read about film technology. They want to see the difference.

Challenges Identified:

Challenges Identified:

Challenges Identified:

  1. Profitability Gap: High-margin services were hidden, leading to missed revenue.

  2. Knowledge Gap: Users struggled to understand technical differences, causing hesitation.

The Solution

The Solution

The Solution

To close these gaps, we focused on visual education over text explanations:

Centralized Service Catalog

Implemented a centralized service catalog menu. This intuitive navigation feature provided users with a clear overview of all services offered, enhancing accessibility and navigation efficiency.

Interactive Visualizers

We developed multiple visualizers tailored for different services. These tools allowed users to interactively explore and understand the nuances of each service, fostering better informed decision-making.

What we've achived

What we've achived

What we've achived

The strategic shift to visual tools delivered immediate results:


  • Increased Visibility: Traffic to previously 'hidden' services saw a measurable uptick.

  • Better Informed Users: The visualizers reduced customer confusion, leading to higher quality inquiries.

  • Streamlined Navigation: The centralized catalog successfully reduced the clicks required to find specific services


This initiative not only addressed user education challenges but also contributed to enhancing overall user experience and increasing engagement with less recognized but highly profitable services.

Testing & Validation

Testing & Validation

We didn't guess, we tested. I ran multiple rounds of usability testing to validate the navigation structure and visualizer concepts.


Key Insight

Early tests revealed users were confused by industry jargon like "Ceramic IR" and "Carbon Film." I used this data to push for plain-language labels ("Maximum Heat Rejection," "Best Value"), ensuring the final design was intuitive for non-technical users.

Key Findings That Changed the Design


Finding 1:

Users missed the quote button

5 of 8 test users couldn't find the CTA on mobile.

→ Solution: Added sticky bottom bar. Mobile quote requests +67%


Finding 2:

Service names confused users

"Ceramic IR" meant nothing to regular customers.

→ Solution: Added benefit subtitles. Service page bounce rate -24%


Finding 3:

Gallery lacked context

Users loved photos but asked "what tint shade is that?"

→ Solution: Added overlay labels. Gallery-to-quote conversion +31%

Scaling the Visuals

Scaling the Visuals

The site required 380+ unique pages, and stock photos wouldn't cut it—they don't show real tint shades accurately, and competitors used the same images.


What I Produced

  • 300+ original photos across all service types

  • 8 product videos showing installation process


To manage this volume, I set up a DAM (Digital Asset Management) system organized by service type, vehicle model, and tint shade—ensuring every page had consistent, brand-authentic visuals.

Impact achieved:

Enhanced Visual Appeal: The use of original, high-quality images significantly improved the website's visual appeal.

Brand Integrity: Consistent imagery strengthened the brand's visual identity and credibility.

Efficient Asset Management: The DAM system streamlined the management and deployment of assets, saving time and ensuring consistency.

Optimized Performance: By carefully compressing and resizing images, we maintained site performance without compromising on visual quality.

Launch & Quality Assurance

Launch & Quality Assurance

A design is only as good as its implementation. During the build, I worked directly with developers to QA the site across devices, tracking every inconsistency in a shared log. This ensured the final live site matched the approved designs.


The results:

54% ↑

54% ⬆️

54% ⬆️

Conversion Rate

More visitors requesting quotes—directly impacting revenue.

31% ↓

31% ⬇️️

31% ⬇️️

Bounce Rate

Users exploring more pages instead of leaving immediately.

43% ↑

43% ⬆️

43% ⬆️

Time on Site

Longer sessions indicating more engaging content.

SEO Rankings Protected

All #1-3 positions maintained. Zero traffic loss during migration.

Post-launch, I continued monitoring user behavior via heatmaps and analytics, running A/B tests on key landing pages to squeeze out additional conversion gains.

Reflection

Reflection

Reflection

This project was a crash course in balancing research insights against business constraints. I had to constantly negotiate between what user testing revealed and what SEO requirements allowed.


What I Learned
The best UX isn't always the "ideal" solution - it's the one that works within real constraints. By bringing data to stakeholder conversations (showing test results, not just opinions), I could advocate for users while respecting business realities.


What I'd Do Differently

  • Build a component library earlier. By page 30, inconsistencies were creating design debt.

  • Document research findings in real-time. Reconstructing rationale months later was harder than it should have been.

Other projects

Other projects

CoNtact ME ANyTIME

All rights reserved, 2025